List of texts

RL1

Grunwald, Armin. 2007a. Editorial. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 3, no. 1: 1-5.
Bechmann, Gotthard, Michael Decker, Ulrich Fiedeler, and Bettina-Johanna Krings. 2007. Technology_assessment_in_a_complex_world. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 3, no. 1: 6-27.
Europäische Akademie. 2004. TAMI Technology Assessment in Europe Between Method and Impact.

RL2

Tuininga, E J. 1988. Technology Europe Assessement. Futures. February: 37-45.
Van Merkerk, R, and R Smits. 2008. Tailoring CTA for emerging technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75, no. 3 (March): 312-333. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.01.003.

RL3

Schot, Johan, and Arie Rip. 1997. The past and future of Constructive Technology Assessement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54, no. 1996: 251-268.
Herdman, Roger, and James Jensen. 1997. The OTA story: The Agency Perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 143: 131-143.

RL4

Grunwald, Armin. 2007. Converging technologies: Visions, increased contingencies of the conditio humana, and search for orientation. Futures 39, no. 4 (May): 380-392. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2006.08.001.
Grunwald, Armin. 2003. Technology assessment at the German Bundestag: ‘expertising’ democracy for ‘democratising’ expertise. Science and Public Policy 30, no. 3: 193-198.

RL5

Hennen, Leonhard. 1999. Participatory technology assessment: a response to technical modernity? Science and Public Policy 26, no. 5 (October): 303-312. doi:10.3152/147154399781782310.
ETAG. 2006. Technology Assessment on Converging Technologies. European Parliament (IP/A/STOA/ST/2006-6), October. Brussels.

RL6

Richard Sclove (2010), Reinventing Technology Assessment: A 21st Century Model (Washington, DC: Science and Technology Innovation Program, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars).

RL7

Guglielmi, Marco, Stéphane Lascar, Vittorio Mastrocola, and Edmund Williams. 2006. Evaluating R&D with “First bounce-Last bounce” framework. Technology Management: 44-50.

RL8

Smits, Ruud, Rutger Van Merkerk, David H. Guston, and Daniel Sarewitz. 2008. The role of TA in Systemic Innovation Policy. Innovation Studies Utrecht ISU Working Paper Series #08.01. Utrecht.
Newman, Nils C, Alan L Porter, J David Roessner, Alisa Kongthon, and Xiao-Yin Jin. 2010. Differences over a decade: high tech capabilities and competitive performance of 28 nations. Research Evaluation 14, no. 2 (October): 121-128.

RL9

EPTA. 2010. Routes to sustainable transport – An overview of status and policy strategies for sustainable transport in Europe. Transport. Copenhagen.

RL10

Verspagen, Bart. 2007. Mapping Technological Trajectories as patent citation networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in Complex Systems 10, no. 1: 93-115.
Godinho, Manuel Mira. 2007. Indicadores de C&T, inovação e conhecimento: onde estamos? Para onde vamos? Análise Social XLII, no. 182: 239-274.

RL11

Anders Kofoed-Wiuff, Alexandros Filippidis, Kenneth Karlsson, Sara Moro. 2009. Future energy systems in Europe. European Parliament – STOA. Brussels, pages 79

RL12

Coenen, C. et al. (2009) Human Enhancement, European Parliament, STOA, Brussels, pages 202

RL13

Ferreira Gomes, José. 2010. A Ciência em Portugal. Comissão Parlamentar de Educação e Ciência – Assembleia da República. Lisboa. doi:ISBN: 978-972-556-553-7.

RL14

Hennen, Leonhard. 2001. TA in Biomedicine and Healthcare – from clinical evaluation to policy consulting. TA-Datenbank-Nachrichten 1, no. 10: 13-22.
Banta, David, and Wija Oortwijn. 2001. Health Technology Assessment and Health Care in the European Union. TA-Datenbank-Nachrichten 1, no. 10: 29-37.
Perleth, Matthias, and Claudia Wild. 2001. Possibilities for partial integration of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Technology Assessment (TA). TA-Datenbank-Nachrichten 1, no. 10: 55-58.

RL15

House of Commons. 2010. Are we realising out potential? The Science and Technology Committee. London.
Kuwahara, Terutaka. 2001. Technology Foresight in Japan- The Potential and Implications of DELPHI Approach. In The proceedings of international conference on technology foresight – The approach to and the potential for New Technology Foresight, ed. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, 1-17. Tokyo.

RL16

Scott, Nial, Leonhard Hennen, Miltos Ladikas, Xinghua Zhu, Michael Decker, and Zhenxing Li. 2009. Embedding society in science and technology policy – European and chinese perspectives. Ed. Miltos Ladikas. Governance An International Journal Of Policy And Administration. European C. Brussels: European Communities.

RL17

Marisa Matias. 2010. Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2001/83/EC as regards the prevention of the entry into the legal supply chain of medicinal products which are falsified in relation to their identity, history or source (COM(2008)0668 – C6-0513/2008 – 2008/0261(COD)). European Parliament – Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. Brussels.
Marisa Matias. 2010. Report on a European initiative on Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias(2010/2084(INI)). European Parliament – Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. Brussels.

RL18

Santos Pereira, Tiago, António Farinhas Rodrigues, António Manuel Carvalho and João Arriscado Nunes. 2010. “Parlamento e Conhecimento Científico? – Dupla delegação?“. In A Qualidade da Democracia em Debate, Leite Viegas, José Manuel, Susana Santos and Sérgio Faria (Ed.s), Editora Mundos Sociais, Lisboa

RL19

Carlos Alberto da Silva et al. 2008. Dilema da Avaliação de Tecnologias da Saúde. Economia e Sociologia n.º 86, Évora, páginas 43-57

RL20, RL30, RL33

Feller-Länzlinger, Ruth, Ueli Haefeli, Stefan Rieder, Martin Biebricher, and Karl Weber. 2010. All sized up – Counting, calculating and controlling in the knowledge-based society. Ed. TA-SWISS. TA-SWISS Z. Bern: TA-SWISS. Page 26-36

RL21

Fernando, M. and González, V. (2000). Hacia la comprensión de la técnica. Pages 19-32 and 48-71.

RL22

Grunwald, Armin. 2007a. Editorial. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 3, no. 1: 1-5.
Bechmann, Gotthard, Michael Decker, Ulrich Fiedeler, and Bettina-Johanna Krings. 2007. Technology_assessment_in_a_complex_world. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 3, no. 1: 6-27.

RL23

Stame, Nicoletta. 2004. Theory-Based Evaluation and Types of Complexity. Evaluation 10, no. 1: 58-76.

RL24

Tuininga, E J. 1988. Technology Europe Assessement. Futures. February: 37-45.
Van Merkerk, R, and R Smits. 2008. Tailoring CTA for emerging technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75, no. 3 (March): 312-333. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.01.003.

RL25

Schot, Johan, and Arie Rip. 1997. The past and future of Constructive Technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54, no. 1996: 251-268.
Grunwald, Armin. 2007. Converging technologies: Visions, increased contingencies of the conditio humana, and search for orientation. Futures 39, no. 4 (May): 380-392. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2006.08.001.

RL26

Hennen, Leonhard. 1999. Participatory technology assessment: a response to technical modernity? Science and Public Policy 26, no. 5 (October): 303-312. doi:10.3152/147154399781782310.
Richard Sclove. 2010. Reinventing Technology Assessment: A 21st Century Model (Washington, DC: Science and Technology Innovation Program, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars).

RL27

Europäische Akademie. 2004. TAMI Technology Assessment in Europe: Between Method and Impact.

RL28

Smits, Ruud, Rutger Van Merkerk, David H. Guston, and Daniel Sarewitz. 2008. The role of TA in Systemic Innovation Policy. Innovation Studies Utrecht ISU Working Paper Series #08.01. Utrecht.
Godinho, Manuel Mira. 2007. Indicadores de C&T, inovação e conhecimento: onde estamos? Para onde vamos?. Análise Social XLII, no. 182: 239-274.

RL29

Kuwahara, Terutaka. 2001. Technology Foresight in Japan- The Potential and Implications of DELPHI Approach. In The proceeding of international conference on technology foresight – The approach to and the potential for New Technology Foresight, ed. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, 1-17. Tokyo.

RL31

Weber, K. Matthias, Klaus Kubeczko and Harald Rohracher (2006), System innovations in innovation systems. Conceptual foundations and experiences with Adaptive Foresight in Austria, Paper for the EASST 2006 Conference, Lausanne, 23-26 August 2006.

RL32

Von Storch, Hans and Dennis Bray (2010) “Against politicization of science – Comment on S. Keller: Scientization: putting global climate change on the scientific agenda since 1970 and the role of the IPCC“, Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg 7-3. Pages 211-219

RL34

European Commission (2007) Taking European knowledge society seriously – Science & Governance [EUR 22700], Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

RL35

Phillips and Pugh (2005) How to Get a PhD – A handbook for students and their supervisors, Open University Press, Berkshire UK, p.235

RL36

Hennen and Nierling (2014) A next wave of Technology Assessment? Barriers and Opportunities for establishing TA in seven European Countries. Science and Public Policy pp. 1–15. doi:10.1093/scipol/scu020

RL37

Fleischer, Torsten, Michael Decker, and Ulrich Fiedeler. 2005. “Assessing Emerging technologies—Methodological Challenges and the Case of Nanotechnologies.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72 (9) (November): 1112–1121. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.005. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0040162505001460.

RL38

Gregor Dürrenberger et al. – Focus Groups in Integrated Assessment. A manual for a participatory tool, ULYSSES Working Paper, WP-97-2

RL39

Reber, Bernard (2007) “TA as Policy Analysis: From expert advice to participatory approaches“, in Handbook of public policy analysis: theory, politics, and methods, ed. Fischer F., Gerald J. Miller and Mara S. Sidney, Francis Taylor Group, p.493-511.

RL40

Bräutigam, Jörissen and Priefer. 2014. “The extent of food waste generation across EU-27: Different calculation methods and the reliability of their results”. Waste Management Resources 32(8): 683-94. doi: 10.1177/0734242X14545374. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25161274?dopt=Abstract

RL41

Gonçalves, Fernando and João Caraça (1987) Towards Technology Assessment in Portugal. in Technological Assessment – An opportunity for Europe.
Abreu, Mário (1987) The Role of the Junta Nacional de Investigação Científica e Tecnológica (JNICT) in the development of the Portuguese Scientific and Technological System. in Technological Assessment – An opportunity for Europe.

RL42

Ganzevles, Jurgen, Rinie van Est and Michael Nentwich (2014) Embracing variety: introducing the inclusive modelling of (Parliamentary) technology assessment, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1:3, 292-313, DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2014.968439

RL43

Alves, Carlos C., 2011: Monitoring Policy and Research Activities on Science in Society in Europe (MASIS) National Report, Portugal, Copenhagen, COWI/MASIS.

RL44

Arie Rip (2012) Futures of technology assessment, in Decker, Grunwald and Knapp, Der Systemblick auf Innovation, Berlin, Ed. Sigma, 29-39 pp.

RL45

Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1132–1153. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008

RL46

Böhle, Knud, and António Moniz. 2015. “No Countries for Old Technology Assessment? Sketching the Efforts and Opportunities to Establish Parliamentary TA in Spain and Portugal.” Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie Und Praxis 24 (1): 29–44. doi:2199-9201. http://www.tatup-journal.de/tatup151_bomo15a.php.

RL47

Bechmann, Gotthard; Michael Decker; Ulrich Fiedeler; Bettina-Johanna Krings. 2007. Technology_assessment_in_a_complex_world. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 3, no. 1: 6-27.
Herdman, R. and Jensen, J. 1997. The OTA Story: The Agency Perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54, 131-143

RL48

Armin Grunwald (2009): Technology Assessment: Concepts and Methods, in Meijers, A. et al., Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Volume 9: Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Elsevier BV, pp. 1103-1146

RL49

GAO (2019), Technology Assessments Design Handbook: Handbook for Key Steps and Considerations in the of Technology Assessments, Washington, 50 pp.

RL50

Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (High-Level Group on Artificial Intelligence)
White Paper on Artificial Intelligence – A European Approach
The ethics of artificial intelligence: Issues and initiatives (European Parliament – STOA study)

RL51

Erik Fisher, Roop L. Mahajan and Carl Mitcham (2006), Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 485-496 (DOI: 10.1177/0270467606295402)
Rathenau Instituut (2020), Annual report 2019, The Hague, Rathenau Instituut, 48 pp.

RL52

Observatório de Cibersegurança (2020), Relatório Riscos & Conflitos de 2020, Lisboa, CNCS,

RL53

Rutger O. van Merkerk and Ruud E.H.M. Smits (2007), Tailoring CTA for emerging technologies, Technological Forecasting & Social Change xx (2007)

RL54

Débora Vanessa Campos Freire; Juliana Müller Reis Jorge; Ana Clara Cândido (2019), Avaliação tecnológica para comunicações críticas: contexto social, in Aproximação entre a Ciência da Informação com a Ciência Policial, Capítulo VI, SENAC SC, pp. 105-133.

RL55